<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Addicted To 1's and 0's &#187; politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.addto10.com/tag/politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.addto10.com</link>
	<description>A continuation of the nerd vs. dork debate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 14:12:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Rep. Charles Rangel and The Pair Of $40,000 Websites</title>
		<link>http://www.addto10.com/rep-charles-rangel-and-the-pair-of-40000-websites/</link>
		<comments>http://www.addto10.com/rep-charles-rangel-and-the-pair-of-40000-websites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 14:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Funny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unusual]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.addto10.com/?p=106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Politico has just reported that New York Democratic Representative Charles Rangel has paid his son nearly $80,000 for two horrible looking campaign websites. While it is technically not illegal, if I was paying taxes in the state of New York I probably wouldn&#8217;t have appreciated paying for that. Here&#8217;s the only one that they [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="/images/80thousand_for_two_websites.jpg" alt="$80,000 for two websites"/></p>
<p><a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1208/16219.html">The Politico </a>  has just reported that New York Democratic Representative Charles Rangel has paid his son nearly $80,000 for two horrible looking campaign websites. While it is technically not illegal, if I was paying taxes in the state of New York I probably wouldn&#8217;t have appreciated paying for that.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the only one that they listed, <a href="http://www.nationalleadershippac.com/">www.nationalleadershippac.com</a> , but judging from the design &#038; execution, I can&#8217;t imagine the other being any better.<br />
This is so bad that I think it might resemble those old MS Frontpage templates. Not only that but images are blurry, improperly cropped and there are spelling/grammatical errors throughout the site! </p>
<p>And to think that <em>this</em> is what a $40,000 website looks like! My favorite part is in the left sidebar, I&#8217;ve taken the liberty of taking a screen shot of it for you. What kind of professional would ever go live with the following still on the site:</p>
<p><center><img src="/images/left_sidebar_screenshot_40kwebsite.jpg" alt="An excuse for why the site sucks"/></center></p>
<p>$40,000 and he couldn&#8217;t even out-source it for $200 to any number of the cheap freelance sites that are available? Thats amazing!</p>
<p>According to The Politico,</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Steven Rangel&#8217;s firm was paid roughly $2,500 on a monthly basis—less than the firm that had previously managed Congressman Rangel&#8217;s Web and on-line operation (Network Politics)—and the firm&#8217;s fees included money for Web advertising designed to promote traffic to the Web site.” </p></blockquote>
<p>Ouch!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.addto10.com/rep-charles-rangel-and-the-pair-of-40000-websites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
